Just completed the Sandpipers. Just a few more touchups since last week. As I sat there looking it over, I could always look at something that I could add a bit to or touchup but I are they really necessary? So this one is complete. I've started on the next and will have an update to it next week.
Wednesday, April 30, 2014
Monday, April 28, 2014
Checklist For A Successful Painting
For a painting to be successful it
must be able to engage the viewer and keep his or her interest. It must have
the right combination of elements and arranged in a way that keeps the viewer
from walking on to the next painting without any further thought. It must draw
the viewer in and make the viewer become a participant in it.
There are many good books out there
on composition and I have a few. Well, more than a few. I try to go through
them before each new painting, so that hopefully I retain enough to put
together a nice composition. I recently condensed thoughts from these books
into a checklist for myself that I could use when putting the composition
together.
My process runs along these lines. First
I refresh myself on the most important elements of composition – my Checklist.
Then I do some small, quick thumbnail sketches to get a general idea of what I
want the painting to look like. The size varies but I generally make them 3” by
5” to 5” by 7”. It may be that I already have a photo of a scene I want to do,
so I use it to develop thumbnails. I might have to rearrange things a bit. Take
some stuff out, move other things over a bit. Maybe the branch of a tree is
blocking part of the view I want to keep or maybe I want to extend the branch
to help frame an area of interest. Maybe I want the sky to be more interesting
or less interesting. The good thing about the thumbnails also is that I can
forget about individual objects for a moment and concentrate on forms and flow
and balance – how they fit together and relate to one another.
When I’m satisfied with the
arrangement of elements in my sketch I work out the tones and colors. This
requires a tone sketch and a color sketch. Both are the same small thumbnails
and, again the sketches are elemental with just forms and lines blocked in – no
emphasis on objects. The tone sketch comes first because I think tone is more
important. When I’m pleased with the arrangement of tones I work on the color
sketch using the tonal sketch as a basis. Sometimes I’ll make a black and white
photo of my finished color study to see if it matches my tonal study.
After I’m satisfied with all of my
study thumbnails – the layout, the tonal sketch and the color sketch, I start
to gather reference material. I use the reference material to start working up
the full size pencil drawing. I don’t intend the pencil drawing to be a
finished piece of work, just full size with all the elements without small
details. I usually do the drawing on tracing paper because it’s easy to erase
and start over. Also, I can draw elements of the painting on other sheets of
tracing paper, cut them out and move them around on the main sheet and when I
like the arrangement, tape them down. Then I just lay another piece of tracing
paper on top and re-draw it. I might do this a few times before I end up with a
drawing I like.
When the composition is finished I
use the checklist to see how I did. Sometimes I’m happy with it, other times I
have to make more changes. It doesn’t always work out perfectly but I think the
less I leave to chance the more likely I’ll wind up with something good. At
least, that’s the plan.
Next week I’ll present Part Two –
The Checklist.
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Work in Progress - Sandpipers, Update 9
This has been a difficult week. One of the changes I wanted
to make was to darken the upper left hand corner a bit. The idea was to show
some sand as the waves drew away from the beach. I did put that in but it was
unhappy with it. It turned out too dark in my estimation, so I had to remove
it. The darker area became more of a focus point for the eye. It competed with the
Sandpipers. Removing it took some doing but I got it back to nearly the same
tone as in Week 8. Just a bit darker. That seemed better. Another change I made
was to subdue the seaweed a bit so it wasn’t as colorful. The brighter colors
also competed with the birds, so dulling it down somewhat by adding more green
helped. The birds now stand out more. I have done a little more on the foam but
still have just a bit more to do.
Monday, April 21, 2014
For realism and control, try the Priming Method
I recently took time to write an
email to Susan Harrison-Tustain, a watercolor artist who I admire for her
detail work and control, concerning how she approaches different kinds of
paintings using her unique priming method for watercolor paintings. I wanted to
know if she used the same priming method for landscapes that she uses for her
botanical studies. Briefly, Susan’s method involves first applying clear water
to a section being worked on, allowing that to nearly dry, then applying a
second layer of clear water. Care is taken to wet only the area to be painted,
such as a leaf or petal, with sharply defined borders. When the area has lost
the wet look but is still damp, she applies the color. If another glaze is
desired on top (which most often it will be) allow the first glaze to
completely dry first. Otherwise the new glaze will loosen the previous glaze.
This method allows for a uniform
layer of color and enables the artist to apply graded glazes for nice uniform
transition in toning. Great control is also achieved. Sometimes an undercoat of
yellow is applied during the priming to achieve a glowing effect.
The priming method is used to
achieve high detail and realism and is not for those who like to do loose,
spontaneous watercolor paintings. This
method seems more in keeping with my style of painting and is one I intend to
put into practice in doing my architectural and botanical paintings.
That being said, I also love the
loose watercolor paintings, too, and sometimes have a tough time deciding which
to use. I think both techniques have their pluses depending on the situation.
The loose, free style can be so liberating.
In answer to my query to her
concerning how and when she applies her priming method (PM) to landscapes as
well as botanical subjects, Susan wrote back that she uses the priming method
for all paintings where the area is big enough, that is, areas greater than 1
square inch. She uses the method for the first few layers, then goes on to
traditional wet in wet techniques. With the first few layers she has already
established a good base with gradations and blending. If she is working on skin
or fabric she may continue the priming.
In a second email exchange Susan
was quick to add, and rightly so, the importance of Composition. Regardless of
technique, composition is critical in laying out a compelling painting.
Painting comes after all the pre-planning. Susan believes that what is crucial
to good composition is color, color temperature, tone, intensity and edges. Composition
is a good subject for another discussion.
My style is one of realism and
detail. Most times, nearly always actually, when I start drawing or painting, I
may think loose, even start loose, but as I progress, I tighten up my painting,
and add more and more detail. It suits my personality and style. The priming
method of Susan Harrison-Tustain seems a great way to practice my style. If you
think you’d like the priming method or just want to know more about it, you can
learn more of Susan’s method by visiting her website susanart.com.
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
Work in Progress - Sandpipers, Update 8
My last update on the Sandpipers prompted a number of
comments on another website (A Singular Creation) that caused me to re-evaluate
it. I asked for comments and opinions on Fine Art America and A Singular Creation,
and emailed a number of very talented, knowledgeable and respected wildlife
artists whose opinions I thought valuable. That brought a flood of comments
ranging from "it looks good just as it is" to suggestions that I
change this or that. I'm pleased that none suggested any drastic changes.
However, there were enough comments and suggestions that I thought it necessary
to take another look at the painting and see if there was room to improve it.
There was, I thought. At the risk of being redundant, I've decided to include
my thoughts here again from those discussions because many of you may not want
to seek them out on those discussion boards. For those of you who do, forgive
me for repeating myself. Next week I will post again an Update to the
Sandpipers. So, here is what I posted on those discussion boards concerning the
Sandpiper painting:
I've spent much time going over comments and advice from
everyone on this website and others, and from emails I sent out to other
artists who have a great deal more experience and talent than I have. The
comments have been thought provoking and helped me to take a further serious
look at the Sandpipers painting. It's allowed me to further analyze its
strengths and shortcomings. Thanks to all who have made suggestions. It's been
hard to decide what to do because suggestions have ranged from "do
nothing, it looks good just the way it is" to some criticisms of technique
and composition. None have suggested major revisions or "do over".
All that just goes to show how a creation can affect many people in many
different ways. Everybody is right! We all can look at the same thing and have
entirely different responses to it based on our experiences and background.
Everyone looks for something different in a painting. It's the feeling one gets
by looking at it. That's why we can't always understand why someone wins a
juried competition. The judge's background and experience dictates what's
important and if another judge were to examine the same paintings, results may
be quite different. That's also why so many books have been written. Some
people find detail and accuracy very important while others are more concerned
with color or tonal balance or composition of elements, and detail is not high
on their list. In the end, the artist is the one who has to decide if a
painting is "right". The artist has to draw on all of his or her
experiences, knowledge, and feel or intuition, technical skills, style and not
the least, the helpful criticisms, advice and opinions of others who he or she
respects, and how they relate to his or her own feelings. Do the suggestions
fit in with the artists style? The artist can't make all the changes or the
painting will no longer be his or her painting. The changes have to be in
keeping with the artist's style and comfort. If the artist fundamentally
disagrees with the change or it doesn't feel right, the change shouldn't be
made. But that can only be done if the artist has enough background, knowledge
and experience to understand what the change means. I'm not sure if I'm all
that experienced yet but I have gone through the comments and made some
decisions that will change the painting. I hope that the changes I'm going to
make will make the painting better. We'll see after the changes are made.
Whether they make the painting better or not, I will learn something from the
experience. I will learn something that will help me make a better painting in
the future. What works and what doesn't. It will help me to build my knowledge
base, to analyze my paintings better,make it easier to analyze criticisms in
the future, and help me to evaluate those criticisms in relation to my own
(hopefully increased) knowledge base. So, after all this rambling on, here are
the changes I've decided will improve the painting. You're welcome to weigh in
with your opinions.
1. Strengthen the
air bubbles in the foam a bit. Add a bit more to those in the foreground and
not to those further back. I still believe that the foam should look real but
not have so much detail that it attracts too much attention.
2. Dull the birds
in the back a bit to create a bit more depth.
3. Dull the
seaweed some. The bright colors of the seaweed were beginning to compete with
the birds for attention.
4. Darken the
sands in the upper left of the painting. This may help to balance the heavier
elements in the lower right.
So, now it's time to get to work. I'll post next week an
update to the painting.
Wednesday, April 9, 2014
Work in Progress - Sandpipers, Update 8
Completed the painting this week. Finished up the sea foam
and added a few touches here and there. I could have worked in more detail on
the foam but decided against it, as the foam is of secondary importance and I
felt adding detail to the foam would not have benefited the painting in any
way. Attention is on the Sandpipers and that’s where it needed to stay. I will
set the painting aside and look at it here and there to see if anything stands
out or needs adjustment, but I think this will pretty much stand. As always,
observations, critiques and advice are welcome.
My next painting is already started and I’ll start posting
Updates on it next week.
Tuesday, April 8, 2014
New Painting - Lady Slipper Orchid (Paphiopedilum)
Just completed this colored pencil painting of a Lady Slipper Orchid (Paphiopedilum) and wanted to post it for all to see. The plant from which this painting was made actually grows in the Garden of a north Florida estate I managed for many years. It seems to do well in rich garden soil and is a bright spot along a Garden Path. The painting is also for sale and can be seen on my Fine Art America and A Singular Creation Websites.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




